Compare Mobile Phones Side-by-Side

vivo Y50t vs HOTWAV Cyber 8 Rugged Phone

share icon
vivo Y50t Specifcation
HOTWAV Cyber 8 Rugged Phone Specifcation
Motorola Moto G74 Specifcation
Tecno Spark 30 5G Specification

vivo Y50t

$204

84% SPEC SCORE

HOTWAV Cyber 8 Rugged Phone

$179

79% SPEC SCORE

Motorola Moto G74

$239

87% SPEC SCORE

Tecno Spark 30 5G

$190

89% SPEC SCORE

OVERVIEW
Display

Screen Size: 6.53 inches

(1080 X 2340 pixels)

60 Refresh rate

Screen Size: 6.3 inches

(720 X 1520 pixels)

Camera

48+2+2 MP (Triple Camera)

8 MP Selfie

4K Video

16+5+2 MP (Triple Camera)

8 MP Selfie

Video

Hardware
Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm)
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
OS

Android 10

OriginOS

Android 11 Red Velvet Cake

Battery

4500 mAh

Li-Po

8280 mAh

Storage
8GB RAM, 128GB
4GB RAM, 64GB
NETWORK
Technology
GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE
GSM / HSPA / LTE
LAUNCH DATE
Announced Date
2021, November 16
-
Released Date
2021, November 16
2022, April
Status
Available
Available
DISPLAY
Type
IPS LCD
LCD IPS
Refresh Rate
60 Hz
-
Size

Screen Size: 6.53

Surface Area: 104.7 cm²

Screen To Body Ratio: 84.4%

Screen Size: 6.3

Screen To Body Ratio: 72.8%

Resolution
1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio
720 x 1520 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio
Pixel Density
395 ppi
409 ppi
BODY
Dimensions

Height: 162 mm (6.38 inch)

Width: 76.6 mm (3.02 inch)

Depth: 8.5 mm (0.33 inch)

Height: 81 mm

Width: 168 mm

Depth: 17 mm

Weight
190g (6.7 oz)
330g
SIM
Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by)
Dual Sim, GSM+GSM
MAIN CAMERA
Rear Camera
Triple Camera:
  • ➤ 48 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), PDAF
  • ➤ 2 MP, f/2.4, (macro)
  • ➤ 2 MP, f/2.4, (depth)
Triple Camera:
  • ➤ 16 MP, f/1.8, 0.80 µm
  • ➤ 5 MP, f/2.2, (macro)
  • ➤ 2 MP, f/2.2, (depth)
Features
LED flash, HDR, panorama
-
Video
4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS
-
SELFIE CAMERA
Single
8 MP, f/2.0, (wide)
8 MP
Features
HDR
-
Video
1080p@30fps
-
SOFTWARE & HARDWARE
OS

Current Version: Android 10

Custom UI: OriginOS

Current Version: Android 11 Red Velvet Cake

Chipset

Processor: Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm)

Processor: Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762

CPU
Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver)
Octa-core
GPU
Adreno 618
PowerVR GE8320
BATTERY
Type
-
Li-Po
Capacity
4500 mAh
8280 mAh
Removable
No
No
Charging

18W wired

18.0W Fast charge

STORAGE
Internal Memory
128GB 8GB RAM
64GB 4GB RAM
Card slot
microSDXC
Yes , Slot for SD or second SIM card
Storage Type
UFS 2.1
-
CONNECTIVITY
WLAN
Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
802.11a , 802.11b , 802.11g , 802.11n , 802.11n 5GHz , 802.11ac, dual-band, hotspot, Wi-Fi Direct
Bluetooth
5.1, LE, A2DP, aptX HD
5.2, LE, A2DP
Positioning
GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO
GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
NFC
No
-
Radio
No
-
USB
microUSB 2.0, OTG
USB Type C, OTG
SOUND
Loudspeaker
Yes
-
Sound jack
Yes, 3.5
No
SENSORS
Features
Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Fingerprint, Proximity, Light sensor, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Thermometer, Geomagnetic
MISCELLANEOUS
Colors
Black, Blue
-
Models
V2023EA
-

Which Mobile Phone is Better: vivo Y50t or HOTWAV Cyber 8 Rugged Phone ?

Have a look at the benefits of this vivo Y50t and HOTWAV Cyber 8 Rugged Phone given by our tech specs.

Pros of vivo Y50t

  • feature logo

    Offers a 4% larger screen (6.53 inches vs 6.3 inches), ideal for media consumption and gaming.

  • feature logo

    Supports 3x higher resolution (48MP vs 16MP), offering incredible photo clarity and detail.

  • feature logo

    Offers 50% more RAM (8GB vs 4GB), providing smoother multitasking and better performance.

  • feature logo

    vivo Y50t offers significantly more storage, perfect for users needing ample space for their media collections.

Pros of HOTWAV Cyber 8 Rugged Phone

  • feature logo

    Supports 46% higher battery capacity (8280mAh vs 4500mAh), offering longer usage without frequent recharging.

Disclaimer: Information here may not be 100% accurate; please verify specs and prices on the retailer's website before buying.

VS

HOTWAV Cyber 8 Rugged Phone Comparisons