Compare Mobile Phones Side-by-Side

share icon
Motorola Moto E22 Specifcation
Redmi Turbo 4 phone
Tecno Camon 40 Pro Specifications
Realme 15 5G Specification

Motorola Moto E22

81% SPEC SCORE

Redmi Turbo 4

86% SPEC SCORE

Tecno Camon 40 Pro

87% SPEC SCORE

Realme 15 5G

87% SPEC SCORE

OVERVIEW
Display

Screen Size: 6.5 inches

(720 X 1600 pixels)

90 Refresh rate

Screen Size: 6.67 inches

(1220 X 2712 pixels)

120 Refresh rate

Camera

16+2 MP (Dual Camera)

5 MP Selfie

1080P Video

50+8 MP (Dual Camera)

20 MP Selfie

4K Video

Hardware
Mediatek MT6765V/CB Helio G37 (12 nm)
Mediatek Dimensity 8400 Ultra
OS

Android 12

Android 15

HyperOS 2

Battery

Li-Po

4020 mAh

Si/C Li-Ion

6550 mAh

Storage
2GB RAM, 32GB
12GB RAM, 256GB
NETWORK
Technology
GSM / HSPA / LTE
GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G
LAUNCH DATE
Announced Date
2022, September 16
2025, January 02
Released Date
2022, October 11
2025, January 02
Status
Available
Available
DISPLAY
Type
IPS LCD
AMOLED, HDR10+, 3200 nits (peak), 1400 nits (HBM)
Refresh Rate
90 Hz
120 Hz
Size

Screen Size: 6.5

Surface Area: 102 cm²

Screen To Body Ratio: 83.5%

Screen Size: 6.67

Surface Area: 107.4 cm²

Screen To Body Ratio: 88.7%

Color
-
68B colors
Resolution
720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio
1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio
Pixel Density
270 ppi
446 ppi
BODY
Dimensions

Height: 163.6 mm (6.44 inch)

Width: 74.7 mm (2.94 inch)

Depth: 8 mm (0.31 inch)

Height: 161 mm (6.34 inch)

Width: 75.2 mm (2.96 inch)

Depth: 8.1 mm (0.32 inch)

Weight
169g (5.96 oz)
203.5g (7.2 oz)
Build
Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame
-
SIM
Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by)
Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Resistance
-
IP68 Dust tight and water resistant (immersible up to 2m for 30 min)
Other
Water-repellent coating
-
MAIN CAMERA
Rear Camera
Dual Camera:
  • ➤ 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm, PDAF
  • ➤ 2 MP, f/2.4, (depth)
Dual Camera:
  • ➤ 50 MP, f/1.5, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
  • ➤ 8 MP, f/2.2, 15mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Features
LED flash, HDR, panorama
LED flash, HDR, panorama
Video
1080p@30fps
4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS
SELFIE CAMERA
Single
5 MP, f/2.4, 1/5.0", 1.12µm
20 MP, f/2.2, wide, 1/4"
Features
HDR
-
Video
1080p@30fps
1080p@30fps
SOFTWARE & HARDWARE
OS

Current Version: Android 12

Current Version: Android 15

Custom UI: HyperOS 2

Chipset

Processor: Mediatek MT6765V/CB Helio G37 (12 nm)

Processor: Mediatek Dimensity 8400 Ultra

CPU
Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53)
Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-A725 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A725 & 4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A725)
GPU
PowerVR GE8320
G720 MC7 Mali
BATTERY
Type
Li-Po
Si/C Li-Ion
Capacity
4020 mAh
6550 mAh
Removable
No
-
Charging

10W wired

90W wiredPD3.0QC3+100% in 45 min

STORAGE
Internal Memory
32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM
256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM
Card slot
microSDXC (dedicated slot)
No
Storage Type
eMMC 5.1
UFS 4.0
CONNECTIVITY
WLAN
Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band
Wi-Fi 802.11 A/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Bluetooth
5.0, LE, A2DP
6.0, LE, A2DP, APTX, LHDC
Positioning
GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO
GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5)
NFC
Yes
Yes
Radio
Yes
No
USB
USB Type-C 2.0
USB Type-C 2.0, OTG
Infrared port
-
Yes
SOUND
Loudspeaker
Yes, with stereo speakers
Yes, With Stereo Speakers
Sound jack
Yes, 3.5
No
Other
-
24-bit/192khz Hi-res, Hi-res Wireless Audio
SENSORS
Features
Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity
Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
MISCELLANEOUS
Colors
Astro Black, Crystal Blue
Black, White, Blue
Models
-
24129RT7CC

Which Mobile Phone is Better: or ?

Have a look at the benefits of this and given by our tech specs.

Disclaimer: Information here may not be 100% accurate; please verify specs and prices on the retailer's website before buying.

VS

Motorola Moto E22 Comparisons

Motorola Moto E22 most commonly compared with these phones:

VS

Redmi Turbo 4 Comparisons

Redmi Turbo 4 most commonly compared with these phones: