Compare Mobile Phones Side-by-Side

Tecno Pova Neo vs HOTWAV Cyber 8 Rugged Phone

share icon
Tecno Pova Neo Specifcation
HOTWAV Cyber 8 Rugged Phone Specifcation
HMD Ridge Pro Specifcation
Motorola Moto G15 Specs

Tecno Pova Neo

82% SPEC SCORE

HOTWAV Cyber 8 Rugged Phone

79% SPEC SCORE

HMD Ridge Pro

88% SPEC SCORE

Motorola Moto G15

87% SPEC SCORE

OVERVIEW
Display

Screen Size: 6.8 inches

(720 X 1640 pixels)

120 Refresh rate

Screen Size: 6.3 inches

(720 X 1520 pixels)

Camera

13+0 MP (Dual Camera)

8 MP Selfie

1080P Video

16+5+2 MP (Triple Camera)

8 MP Selfie

Video

Hardware
Mediatek MT6762G Helio G25 (12 nm)
Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
OS

Android 11

HIOS 7.6

Android 11 Red Velvet Cake

Battery

6000 mAh

Li-Po

8280 mAh

Storage
4GB RAM, 64GB
4GB RAM, 64GB
NETWORK
Technology
GSM / HSPA / LTE
GSM / HSPA / LTE
LAUNCH DATE
Announced Date
2021, December 09
-
Released Date
2021, December 09
2022, April
Status
Available
Available
DISPLAY
Type
IPS LCD, 480 nits
LCD IPS
Refresh Rate
120 Hz
-
Size

Screen Size: 6.8

Surface Area: 109.8 cm²

Screen To Body Ratio: 82.9%

Screen Size: 6.3

Screen To Body Ratio: 72.8%

Resolution
720 x 1640 pixels
720 x 1520 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio
Pixel Density
263 ppi
409 ppi
BODY
Dimensions

Height: 171.4 mm (6.75 inch)

Width: 77.3 mm (3.04 inch)

Depth: 9.1 mm (0.36 inch)

Height: 81 mm

Width: 168 mm

Depth: 17 mm

Weight
-
330g
Build
Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame
-
SIM
Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by)
Dual Sim, GSM+GSM
Resistance
Splash resistant
-
MAIN CAMERA
Rear Camera
Dual Camera:
  • ➤ 13 MP, f/1.8, (wide), AF
  • ➤ null MP, Secondary unknown camera
Triple Camera:
  • ➤ 16 MP, f/1.8, 0.80 µm
  • ➤ 5 MP, f/2.2, (macro)
  • ➤ 2 MP, f/2.2, (depth)
Features
Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama
-
Video
1080p@30fps
-
SELFIE CAMERA
Single
8 MP, f/2.0
8 MP
Features
Dual-LED flash, HDR
-
Video
1080p@30fps
-
SOFTWARE & HARDWARE
OS

Current Version: Android 11

Custom UI: HIOS 7.6

Current Version: Android 11 Red Velvet Cake

Chipset

Processor: Mediatek MT6762G Helio G25 (12 nm)

Processor: Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762

CPU
Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53)
Octa-core
GPU
PowerVR GE8320
PowerVR GE8320
BATTERY
Type
-
Li-Po
Capacity
6000 mAh
8280 mAh
Removable
No
No
Charging

18W wired

18.0W Fast charge

STORAGE
Internal Memory
64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM
64GB 4GB RAM
Card slot
microSDXC (dedicated slot)
Yes , Slot for SD or second SIM card
Storage Type
eMMC 5.1
-
CONNECTIVITY
WLAN
Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
802.11a , 802.11b , 802.11g , 802.11n , 802.11n 5GHz , 802.11ac, dual-band, hotspot, Wi-Fi Direct
Bluetooth
5.0, LE, A2DP
5.2, LE, A2DP
Positioning
GPS
GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
NFC
No
-
Radio
Yes
-
USB
microUSB 2.0, OTG
USB Type C, OTG
SOUND
Loudspeaker
Yes
-
Sound jack
Yes, 3.5
No
SENSORS
Features
Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity
Fingerprint, Proximity, Light sensor, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Thermometer, Geomagnetic
MISCELLANEOUS
Colors
Obsidian, Geek blue, Powehi
-
Models
LE6, LE6h
-

Which Mobile Phone is Better: Tecno Pova Neo or HOTWAV Cyber 8 Rugged Phone ?

Have a look at the benefits of this Tecno Pova Neo and HOTWAV Cyber 8 Rugged Phone given by our tech specs.

Pros of Tecno Pova Neo

  • feature logo

    Offers a 7% larger screen (6.8 inches vs 6.3 inches), ideal for media consumption and gaming.

  • feature logo

    Offers 33% more RAM (6GB vs 4GB), providing smoother multitasking and better performance.

  • feature logo

    Tecno Pova Neo offers significantly more storage, perfect for users needing ample space for their media collections.

Pros of HOTWAV Cyber 8 Rugged Phone

  • feature logo

    Supports 28% higher battery capacity (8280mAh vs 6000mAh), offering longer usage without frequent recharging.

  • feature logo

    Supports 1x higher resolution (16MP vs 13MP), offering incredible photo clarity and detail.

Disclaimer: Information here may not be 100% accurate; please verify specs and prices on the retailer's website before buying.

VS

HOTWAV Cyber 8 Rugged Phone Comparisons