Compare Mobile Phones Side-by-Side
Nokia C32 vs HOTWAV Cyber 8 Rugged Phone
Nokia C32
80% SPEC SCORE
HOTWAV Cyber 8 Rugged Phone
79% SPEC SCORE
HMD Ridge Pro
88% SPEC SCORE
Motorola Moto G15
87% SPEC SCORE
Screen Size: 6.5 inches
(720 X 1600 pixels)
60 Refresh rate
Screen Size: 6.3 inches
(720 X 1520 pixels)
50+2 MP (Dual Camera)
8 MP Selfie
1080P Video
16+5+2 MP (Triple Camera)
8 MP Selfie
Video
Android 13
Android 11 Red Velvet Cake
Li-Po
5000 mAh
Li-Po
8280 mAh
Screen Size: 6.5
Surface Area: 102 cm²
Screen To Body Ratio: 81.6%
Screen Size: 6.3
Screen To Body Ratio: 72.8%
Front Protection: Scratch-resistant glass
Height: 164.6 mm (6.48 inch)
Width: 75.9 mm (2.99 inch)
Depth: 8.6 mm (0.34 inch)
Height: 81 mm
Width: 168 mm
Depth: 17 mm
- ➤ 50 MP, (wide), AF
- ➤ 2 MP, (macro)
- ➤ 16 MP, f/1.8, 0.80 µm
- ➤ 5 MP, f/2.2, (macro)
- ➤ 2 MP, f/2.2, (depth)
Current Version: Android 13
Current Version: Android 11 Red Velvet Cake
Processor: Unisoc SC9863A1 (22nm)
Processor: Mediatek Helio P22 MT6762
10W wired
18.0W Fast charge
Which Mobile Phone is Better: Nokia C32 or HOTWAV Cyber 8 Rugged Phone ?
Have a look at the benefits of this Nokia C32 and HOTWAV Cyber 8 Rugged Phone given by our tech specs.
Pros of Nokia C32
Offers a 3% larger screen (6.5 inches vs 6.3 inches), ideal for media consumption and gaming.
This Device camera captures 50MP sharper and more vibrant photos, ideal for photography enthusiasts.
Supports higher RAM capacity compare to HOTWAV Cyber 8 Rugged Phone, enabling faster switching between apps and better performance in demanding applications
Provides 2x storage capacity (128GB vs 64GB), allowing you to store more apps, media, and files.
Pros of HOTWAV Cyber 8 Rugged Phone
Supports 40% higher battery capacity (8280mAh vs 5000mAh), offering longer usage without frequent recharging.
Disclaimer: Information here may not be 100% accurate; please verify specs and prices on the retailer's website before buying.
