Compare Mobile Phones Side-by-Side

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL vs Motorola Razr 50 Ultra

share icon
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL Specification
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra Specification
Oppo Find N5 Flip Specification
Nothing Fold 1 Specifcation

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL

$1,099

85% SPEC SCORE

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra

$1,283

77% SPEC SCORE

Oppo Find N5 Flip

$1,194

91% SPEC SCORE

Nothing Fold 1

$1,076

86% SPEC SCORE

OVERVIEW
Display

Screen Size: 6.8 inches

(1344 X 2992 pixels)

120 Refresh rate

Screen Size: 6.9 inches

(1080 X 2640 pixels)

165 Refresh rate

Camera

50+48+48 MP (Triple Camera)

42 MP Selfie

8K Video

50+50 MP (Dual Camera)

32 MP Selfie

4K Video

Hardware
Google Tensor G4 (4 nm)
Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm)
OS

Android 14

Android 14

Battery

Li-Ion

5060 mAh

Li-ion

4000 mAh

Storage
16GB RAM, 128GB
8GB RAM, 256GB
NETWORK
Technology
GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G
GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G
LAUNCH DATE
Announced Date
2024, August 13
2024, June 25
Released Date
2024, August 22
2024, June 25
Status
Available
Available
DISPLAY
Type
LTPO OLED, HDR10+, 3000 nits (peak), 2000 nits (HBM)
Foldable LTPO AMOLED, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 3000 nits (peak)
Refresh Rate
120 Hz
165 Hz
Size

Screen Size: 6.8

Surface Area: 109.7 cm²

Screen To Body Ratio: 88%

Screen Size: 6.9

Surface Area: 107.6 cm²

Screen To Body Ratio: 84.9%

Color
-
1B colors
Resolution
1344 x 2992 pixels, 20:9 ratio
1080 x 2640 pixels
Pixel Density
486 ppi
413 ppi
Cover Display
-

Type: LTPO AMOLED

Size: 4 inches

Resolution: 1272 x 1080 pixels

Pixel Density: ~ : 417 pixels per inch (ppi)

Protection: Gorilla Glass Victus

Color: 1B colors

Sound: Dolby Vision

Refresh rate: 165

Peak brightness: 2400 nits (peak)

Always on Display
Yes
No
BODY
Dimensions

Height: 162.8 mm (6.41 inch)

Width: 76.6 mm (3.02 inch)

Depth: 8.5 mm (0.33 inch)

Height: Unfolded: 171.4 mm Folded: 88.1 mm

Width: Unfolded: 74 mm Folded: 74 mm

Depth: Unfolded: 7.1 mm Folded: 15.3 mm

Weight
221g (780 oz)
189g (6.67 oz)
Build
Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame
Plastic front (unfolded), glass front (folded, Gorilla Glass Victus), silicone polymer back (eco leather), aluminum frame (6000 series), hinge (stainless steel)
SIM
Nano-SIM and eSIM
Nano-SIM, eSIM or Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by)
Resistance
IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min)
IPX8 water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min)
MAIN CAMERA
Rear Camera
Triple Camera:
  • ➤ 50 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, multi-zone Laser AF, OIS
  • ➤ 48 MP, f/2.8, 113mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.55", dual pixel PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom
  • ➤ 48 MP, f/1.7, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.55", dual pixel PDAF
Dual Camera:
  • ➤ 50 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS
  • ➤ 50 MP, f/2.0, (telephoto), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom
Features
LED flash, Pixel Shift, Ultra-HDR, panorama, Best Take
LED flash, panorama, HDR
Video
8K@30fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@24/30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS, 10-bit HDR
4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, HDR10+, gyro-EIS
SELFIE CAMERA
Single
42 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide), PDAF
32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 0.7µm
Features
Auto-HDR, panorama
HDR
Video
4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps
4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps
SOFTWARE & HARDWARE
OS

Current Version: Android 14

Current Version: Android 14

Chipset

Processor: Google Tensor G4 (4 nm)

Processor: Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm)

CPU
Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 & 4x1.92 GHz Cortex-A520)
Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520)
GPU
Mali G715 MC7
Adreno 735
BATTERY
Type
Li-Ion
Li-ion
Capacity
5060 mAh
4000 mAh
Removable
No
No
Charging

37W wiredPD3.0PPS70% in 30 min (advertised)

23W wireless (w/ Pixel Stand)

12W wireless (w/ Qi compatible charger)

Reverse wireless

45W wired

15W wireless

5W reverse wired

STORAGE
Internal Memory
128GB 16GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM
256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM
Card slot
No
No
Storage Type
UFS 3.1
UFS 4.0
CONNECTIVITY
WLAN
Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band
Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, tri-band
Bluetooth
5.3, LE, A2DP, aptX HD
5.3, LE, A2DP, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless
Positioning
GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5)
NFC
Yes
Yes
Radio
No
No
USB
USB Type-C 3.2
USB Type-C 2.0, OTG
Infrared port
No
No
SOUND
Loudspeaker
Yes, with stereo speakers
Yes, with stereo speakers
Sound jack
No
No
Other
-
Snapdragon Sound
PERFORMANCE
AnTuTu Score
-
1140567 v10
GeekBench
-
4441 v6
Mark wild life
-
12024 offscreen 1440p
SENSORS
Features
Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, thermometer (skin temperature)
Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Other
Ultra Wideband (UWB) support, Satellite SOS service
-
MISCELLANEOUS
Colors
Porcelain, Rose Quartz, Hazel, Obsidian
Spring Green (Dill), Midnight Blue (Navy Blazer), Peach Fuzz
Models
GGX8B, GZC4K, GQ57S
-
SAR EU
0.99 W/kg (head) 1.40 W/kg (body)
-

Which Mobile Phone is Better: Google Pixel 9 Pro XL or Motorola Razr 50 Ultra ?

Have a look at the benefits of this Google Pixel 9 Pro XL and Motorola Razr 50 Ultra given by our tech specs.

Pros of Google Pixel 9 Pro XL

  • feature logo

    Google Pixel 9 Pro XL provides 1060mAh more battery capacity, ensuring extended power for heavy use.

  • feature logo

    Supports higher RAM capacity compare to Motorola Razr 50 Ultra, enabling faster switching between apps and better performance in demanding applications

  • feature logo

    Provides 2x storage capacity (1TB vs 512GB), allowing you to store more apps, media, and files.

Pros of Motorola Razr 50 Ultra

  • feature logo

    Offers a 1% larger screen (6.9 inches vs 6.8 inches), ideal for media consumption and gaming.

Disclaimer: Information here may not be 100% accurate; please verify specs and prices on the retailer's website before buying.

VS

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra Comparisons