Compare Mobile Phones Side-by-Side

Casio G'zOne CA-201L vs HOTWAV Cyber 13 Pro Rugged Phone

share icon
Casio G'zOne CA-201L Specification
HOTWAV Cyber 13 Pro Rugged Phone Specifcation
Tecno Camon 40 Pro Specifications
Redmi Note 15 Pro Specification

Casio G'zOne CA-201L

$293

66% SPEC SCORE

HOTWAV Cyber 13 Pro Rugged Phone

$269

81% SPEC SCORE

Tecno Camon 40 Pro

$284

87% SPEC SCORE

Redmi Note 15 Pro

$299

86% SPEC SCORE

OVERVIEW
Display

Screen Size: 4 inches

(480 X 800 pixels)

Screen Size: 6.6 inches

(1080 X 2408 pixels)

90 Refresh rate

Camera

8 MP (Single Camera)

1.3 MP Selfie

Video

64+8+0.3 MP (Triple Camera)

16 MP Selfie

Video

Hardware
Qualcomm MSM8960 Snapdragon S4 Plus
Unisoc Tiger T619
OS

Android 4.0 (Ice Cream Sandwich)

Android 13 Tiramisu

Battery

Li-Ion

1800 mAh

Li-Po

10800 mAh

Storage
1GB RAM, 16GB
12GB RAM, 256GB
NETWORK
Technology
GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE
GSM / HSPA / LTE
LAUNCH DATE
Announced Date
2013, March
-
Released Date
2013, May
2023, August
Status
Discontinued
-
DISPLAY
Type
IPS LCD
LCD IPS
Refresh Rate
-
90 Hz
Size

Screen Size: 4

Surface Area: 45.5 cm²

Screen To Body Ratio: 51.5%

Screen Size: 6.6

Resolution
480 x 800 pixels, 5:3 ratio
1080 x 2408 pixels, 21:9 ratio
Pixel Density
233 ppi
396 ppi
Protection

Front Protection: Corning Gorilla Glass 2

-
BODY
Dimensions

Height: 129.9 mm (5.11 inch)

Width: 68.1 mm (2.68 inch)

Depth: 13.7 mm (0.54 inch)

Height: 84.2 mm

Width: 176.8 mm

Depth: 16.8 mm

Weight
173.8g (6.1 oz)
380g
SIM
Micro-SIM
-
Resistance
IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min)
IP68
Other
MIL-STD-810G compliant
-
MAIN CAMERA
Rear Camera
Single Camera:
  • ➤ 8 MP, AF
Triple Camera:
  • ➤ 64 MP
  • ➤ 8 MP, f/2.2, 1/4", 1.12 µm
  • ➤ 0.3 MP, f/2.2
Features
LED flash
Digital zoom, Autofocus, Touch focus, Panorama, HDR, Face detection, Scene mode
Video
Yes
-
SELFIE CAMERA
Single
1.3 MP
16 MP, f/2.0, 1/3.06", 1.00 µm
SOFTWARE & HARDWARE
OS

Current Version: Android 4.0 (Ice Cream Sandwich)

Current Version: Android 13 Tiramisu

Chipset

Processor: Qualcomm MSM8960 Snapdragon S4 Plus

Processor: Unisoc Tiger T619

CPU
Dual-core 1.5 GHz Krait
Octa-Core
GPU
Adreno 225
Mali G57
BATTERY
Type
Li-Ion
Li-Po
Capacity
1800 mAh
10800 mAh
Removable
Yes
No
Charging
-

20.0W Fast charge

STORAGE
Internal Memory
16GB 1GB RAM
256GB 12GB RAM
Card slot
microSDHC (dedicated slot)
Yes , Slot for SD or second SIM card
CONNECTIVITY
WLAN
Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band, hotspot, Wi-Fi Direct
802.11a , 802.11b , 802.11g , 802.11n , 802.11n 5GHz , 802.11ac, dual-band, hotspot, Wi-Fi Direct
Bluetooth
4.0, LE, A2DP
5.3, A2DP
Positioning
GPS
GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou
NFC
Yes
Yes
Radio
No
Yes
USB
microUSB 2.0
-
Infrared port
Yes
-
SOUND
Loudspeaker
Yes
-
Sound jack
Yes, 3.5
Yes, 3.5
SENSORS
Features
Accelerometer, proximity, compass, thermometer, barometer
Fingerprint, Proximity, Light sensor, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope
MISCELLANEOUS
Colors
Black, Red
-

Which Mobile Phone is Better: Casio G'zOne CA-201L or HOTWAV Cyber 13 Pro Rugged Phone ?

Have a look at the benefits of this Casio G'zOne CA-201L and HOTWAV Cyber 13 Pro Rugged Phone given by our tech specs.

Pros of HOTWAV Cyber 13 Pro Rugged Phone

  • feature logo

    HOTWAV Cyber 13 Pro Rugged Phone provides 9000mAh more battery capacity, ensuring extended power for heavy use.

  • feature logo

    Offers a 39% larger screen (6.6 inches vs 4 inches), ideal for media consumption and gaming.

  • feature logo

    Supports 8x higher resolution (64MP vs 8MP), offering incredible photo clarity and detail.

  • feature logo

    Supports higher RAM capacity compare to Casio G'zOne CA-201L, enabling faster switching between apps and better performance in demanding applications

  • feature logo

    Provides 16x storage capacity (256GB vs 16GB), allowing you to store more apps, media, and files.

Disclaimer: Information here may not be 100% accurate; please verify specs and prices on the retailer's website before buying.

VS

HOTWAV Cyber 13 Pro Rugged Phone Comparisons

HOTWAV Cyber 13 Pro Rugged Phone most commonly compared with these phones: